Experimental Methodology
Overviewβ
KTBIX employs a rigorous three-tier validation framework:
- In-lab controlled experiments β Oxford & NASA datasets
- Field validation β Turkish T-EV platform data (WP1)
- Cross-chemistry generalization β Testing on unseen battery chemistries
EIS Data Acquisition Protocolβ
Equipmentβ
- EIS analyzers: Gamry Reference 3000 / Zahner Zennium (partner laboratory, Istanbul)
- Frequency range: 10 mHz β 100 kHz (51 frequency points per spectrum)
- Voltage amplitude: 10 mV RMS (quasi-linear regime)
- Temperature control: 15Β°C, 25Β°C, 35Β°C, 45Β°C (characterization) + ambient field conditions
Battery Platformsβ
| Platform | Chemistry | Nominal Capacity | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-EV Fleet | NMC | 50β100 Ah | Turkish EV operators |
| TOGG T10X | NMC | ~75 kWh pack | TOGG (MOU pending) |
| Oxford Dataset | LCO | 740 mAh | Oxford University |
| NASA PCoE | 18650 | 2.0 Ah | NASA Prognostics |
SOH Ground Truthβ
SOH is defined as capacity ratio:
Measured via CC-CV charge/discharge cycling with precision coulometry (Β±0.02% accuracy).
Comparison Baselinesβ
Per the evaluation criteria, KTBIX validates against β₯5 state-of-the-art methods:
| Method | Reference | Category |
|---|---|---|
| SVR + EIS features | Roman et al. (2021) | Classical ML |
| LSTM-SOH | You et al. (2017) | Deep learning |
| Transformer-EIS | Tian et al. (2020) | Attention-based |
| AE-BPNN | GΓΌneΕer et al. (2025) | Baseline |
| EIS EC-fitting (Randles) | Vetter et al. (2005) | Physics-based |
| SHAP-SVR | Hannan et al. (2021) | XAI-enhanced ML |
Explainability (XAI) Frameworkβ
SHAP Analysisβ
SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) attributions identify which impedance frequencies contribute most to SOH predictions:
import shap
explainer = shap.DeepExplainer(pi_vib_resnet_model, background_data)
shap_values = explainer.shap_values(test_eis_spectra)
shap.summary_plot(shap_values, feature_names=frequency_labels)
Gradient Saliencyβ
Gradient-based saliency maps highlight input-space sensitivity regions corresponding to , Warburg element (W), and double-layer capacitance (CPE).
Evaluation Metricsβ
Target: RMSE β€1.2%, MAE β€0.9%, RΒ² β₯0.98.
Risk Managementβ
| Risk | Probability | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| TOGG data access delay | Medium | Fallback: expand T-EV fleet + Zenodo public datasets |
| Model overfitting | Low | VIB compression + dropout + cross-validation |
| Cross-chemistry failure | Medium | Physics loss term constrains domain shift |
| Compute cost | Low | Partner HPC cluster + AWS spot instances |